Though two different works about two different issues, Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi and The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass reflect and combat the issues of the Islamic Revolution and American Slavery in similar styles. The two use their descriptiveness and appeal to logic and emotion to get the readers into their shoes.
In Persepolis,a graphic novel,Satrapi states that she wants to be a religious “prophet” like the ones she has read about. She is 10 when the events of the Islamic Revolution in Iran started to take place. Satrapi sees the issues around her, one of them being that she is made to wear a veil. The people that surround her being persecuted and even murdered. She highlights a time that a local cinema had caught fire. When people wanted to rush in and help the police pushed them away. She says the firemen didn’t arrive until forty minutes later. “The BBC said there were 400 victims… But the people knew that it was the Shah’s fault!” Before this time Satrapi lived the life of a normal young girl.
In The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Douglass also started his life as a normal young child, yet he was deceived when around age 8 he was thrown into the harsh lifestyle of slavery. He was born a slave, he had yet to live the life. Douglass reflects on times when he would go the whole year nearly naked, even winters. He would sleep on the ground with little to eat, and the things he’d seen by this age were awful. Douglass discusses the whippings he’d witnessed, one being Aunt Hester. “Soon the warm, red blood came dripping to the floor”, such descriptiveness will make you feel it in your stomach.
While the two had experienced two different things, they were things that no child should be made to go through. The way that they describe these experiences are their way of putting the reader into their shoes and it will appeal to your emotions. While reading both of these works I felt guilty because I wished there was something I could do and I still can’t believe that people in our generation, like Satrapi, have had to live through times like these. And I think that’s what both of these writers wanted. Douglass wanted light shone on slavery at the time because when he published his book in 1845, slavery had not yet been abolished. It would take another 20 years for that to happen. Satrapi published Persepolis in 2000 and I think that she was reflecting, but also showing that at that time their was still turmoil in the Middle East, just like today.


To further compare the two, in a chapter called The Key, Satrapi mentions a time when she came home to her maid crying. When asked what was the matter the maid replied, “They gave this to my son at school. They told the boys that if they went to war and were lucky enough to die, this key would get them into Heaven.” It’s a chilling feeling to think about young boys going to fight for a cause that they don’t know much about. It’s like they are being sold away into war, making it the only thing they know. The only way to get out is to die, much like slavery. The slaves didn’t have an option, much like these boys didn’t have an option. Douglass shares his experiences with moving from owner to owner without his consent. He went through many owners and often times didn’t know why.
We would think of this as another appeal to emotion and while it is, I see it as more of a lack of identity. Both of these books have this underlying theme of identity, or lack thereof. Douglass is a slave, he’s nothing more than another man’s property while Satrapi is made to wear a veil, shielding anyone from seeing her. It’s like these people don’t exist to the people above them. Douglass states, “The white children could tell their ages. I could not tell why I ought to be deprived of the same privilege. I was not allowed to make any inquires of my master concerning it.” Much like the slaves being forced to work and endure whippings, the young men of the Iran Revolution are forced from their homes, made to fight and endure bullets and bombs flying at their heads. And if you questioned it, may God have mercy on you.
Identity doesn’t exist to these people. They just have to push through it and hope that they survive, which is why the ones that persevere and bring attention to these things like Douglass and Satrapi are considered, among many, heroes.

While reading, I couldn’t help but realize how the two seem to speak to their audience. Throughout both works, they would address the reader. Every time Satrapi wanted the reader to know something she would draw herself to look towards them. At first, I didn’t really catch on, but after discussing the book with people that have also read it I started to notice. Satrapi introduces her new style to us, she gets into to rock music and western culture and it’s something that she takes seriously as her distraction from what’s happening around her. She becomes rebellious and she wants us to know. As she finishes perfecting her outfit she turns toward the reader to say, “I put my 1983 Nike’s on and my denim jacket with the Michael Jackson button, and of course, my headscarf.” That type of style and attitude is looked down upon in her country and she wants us to know that she went against the norms anyway.
Douglass does the same thing at the beginning of chapter 11 of his narrative. He says, “I now come to that part of my life during which I planned, and finally succeeded in making, my escape from slavery. But before narrating any of the peculiar circumstances I deem it proper to make known my intention not to state all the facts connected with the transaction.” This is the chapter in which Douglass escapes slavery, but he is smart in doing so. He tells the reader, “I’m gonna tell you my story of escaping, but I’m not gonna tell you how in case any slave owners come across this”, for lack of a better word.
Both do this for appeal, they don’t want to simply tell their stories. They want to make you a character in their story, someone that they can make a connection with. That’s what got me, and other readers alike, fill with emotion and able to understand these writer’s ideas.

It’s not just the ability to write well that makes these writers so great at the appeal that they possess. It is their abilities to escape the issues that they were faced with and the fact that they were able to enlighten the world on what they had experienced. That alone should be enough for some people to be open minded about what the issues discussed. And what is even more impressive is that the issues were combated. Slavery was abolished and though racism still exists today, all people are able to live free in America. Though there is still fighting in the Middle East, at least there are many countries joining together to take action. And that is what makes these works great.





